I chose this blog because I enjoyed my wording and transitions in describing O'Brien's writing style.
One point that suggests that O’Brien’s book marks an original turn when it comes to war experience literature is his candid description
of his (or the character Tim’s) war experience. In other books and movies on war, we get a heroic, romantic image of war and the everyday life of a soldier. The pictures we looked at as part of this assignment also give off that impression; everyone is smiling and posing for the camera. The only thing that reminds you that they are in a war is their uniforms and an occasional, over-sized gun hanging from their necks.

 However, O’Brien offers a totally different image to readers. For example, in the chapter, “The Things They Carried,” O’Brien gives a very detailed list of all the things the men carried and how much each thing weighs. They carry various weapons, lucky charms, comic books, intoxicating drugs, medical supplies, diseases, photographs, and possessions of their loved ones. He also says that they not only carry the physical weight of their supplies, but also their reputations, their fears, their memories of their lives before the war, and the reality that they could die at any given moment. This is a very, very heavy burden to bear. When Ted Lavender was shot, Kiowa says that he simply collapsed. It wasn’t like in the movies where they keep crawling or have last words before they are completely gone. “Boom-down, and you were dead, never partly dead” (page 23, last
paragraph).

 Another point is that O’Brien gives very detailed descriptions
of not only the scenery, but also of what the men are thinking. In the chapter, “On the Rainy River,” it reads, “Even in my imagination, the shore just twenty yards away, I couldn’t make myself be brave. It had nothing to do with morality. Embarrassment, that’s all it was,” on page 57, paragraph 1. He is very honest, and doesn’t sugar-coat any of his thoughts or true feelings. O’Brien also mentions the weather, such as the scorching heat, bitter cold, rolling fog, and the never ending bites of ravenous mosquitoes. This makes readers feel like they are right there, seeing, and feeling the story unfold before their very eyes.

 One interesting story-telling pattern O’Brien employs is that he rarely uses quotation marks around conversation. He just jumps from narrating and thoughts to conversation, and he doesn’t always explicitly mention who is talking, either. It makes it feel more vivid and real—it doesn’t feel like a script or a screenplay where the audience is disconnected from the action and only watching from afar. The audience is right
there—they are the soldiers. They are Tim O’Brien.

The thing that stood out to me the most was the feelings of outrage, sadness, indignation, confusion, and shame that Tim
feels when he receives his draft notice. I was very confused and frustrated during senior year. I was expected to know where I was going to go to college, know what I was going to major in, and know what I was going to do for the rest of my life. I had no idea. I can relate to Tim’s constant worrying and the feeling of being consumed by having to make a choice—however, my situation can’t hold a candle to his. War truly is such a horrible thing. 

The shifting of gears used by O’Brien is truly unique. In the first chapter, he talks about the past, and he also talks in 3rd person. However, in the Chapter, “Spin,” he uses first person in the present tense, and he talks about his life as a writer rather than his story as a soldier, and how the two seem to blend into one another. “I feel guilty sometimes…I’m still writing war stories…it’s an obsession…I should forget it…As a writer, all you can do is pick a street and go for the ride, putting things down as they come at you. That’s the real obsession. All those stories” (page 33, paragraph 2). He so effortlessly switches between 3rd and 1st person; past and present; soldier and story teller; and sometimes, he mixes these elements in such a way that the chapters are linked like a chain of islands. Each is powerful enough to stand on its own, and yet, every island is connected to the other. It’s a truly fascinating style of writing, and I look forward to whatever else O’Brien has in store for readers in his award-winning novel, The Things They Carried.
 
I chose this question for the class because I thought it really made one ponder about how society can change so drastically in such a short time period. It's very fascinating; on one hand society deeply shapes how we can interact with others and can even affect how we perceive ourselves, while on the other hand a single person's attitudes and actions can affect others and eventually change and shape society as a whole.

On page 71, paragraph 6, it reads, "Times came when she fought back with her tongue as best she could, but it didn't do her any good. It just made Joe do more. He wanted her submission and he'd keep on fighting until he felt he had it."

Throughout the novel so far, both of Janie's husbands have belittled, insulted, and physically abused, and have tried to control Janie physically and emotionally. Joe even comments on pages 74 and 75 that women are like "cows or chickens" and that they can't think on their own. Also, in both marriages, Janie feels deceived when her husbands promise her things and sweet talk her before they're married; and afterwards they put her to hard work and try to make a mindless-puppet and, in some cases, a punching bag out of her.


Question: Do you believe that the institution of marriage (or the goal or
what goes on in marriage) has changed since the time being portrayed in this book? If so, what do you think has caused these changes?

 
I chose this blog response because I thought I sufficiently articulated the reason why the short story, "Kabnis," was so different from the other short stories in the book, Cane, by Jean Toomer.

Orignal Question posted by Brittany Miracle: Why do you think that Toomer decided to make Kabnis different than the rest
of the stories, subject-wise?  The others were mainly about women, and if a male was the main character then he was focused on a women.  I had assumed that the final story would follow the same pattern.

Response: I believe that he wanted to write a story based on something that affected him more personally. Toomer grew up living in two worlds, and it seems as if he was tormented from having to chose between them. On one hand, he looked practically White, and could have used this to receive the best treatment in society and avoid constant oppression and racism; on the other hand, he didn't completely want to disown his Black roots, and turn his back on the struggles and sufferings of the people who shared his ancestors. He eventually identified himself as being neither Black nor White, but society again and again kept trying to label him and tried to keep everything segregated--there was only room for Black and White, no Gray or Rainbow. Kabnis shares some of this torment with neither being Black or White, so I feel this last part of the book perhaps gives us the most up-close-and-personal view in on Toomer's life and daily struggles, external and internal.



    Blogs to Remember

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    Avril 2013

    Categories

    Tous